This is with reference to the article “Rise and fall of a student star” (March 22) by Bikram Vohra. What is the author trying to imply? What was the use of this article?
He is entitled to his opinion but it should be based on some logic. The writer should have focused on the follies of Kanhaiya Kumar’s approach and the resultant uproar in the media and the political arena. Instead of doing that he unnecessarily raised the issue of psychological problems and the link between suicide and fame.
Many people in and outside India did not support Kumar and his associates and it is fine, as this is the beauty of democracy. Writers should try not to take sides and remain objective while writing articles or analyses.
Khalid Saifullah
He is entitled to his opinion but it should be based on some logic. The writer should have focused on the follies of Kanhaiya Kumar’s approach and the resultant uproar in the media and the political arena. Instead of doing that he unnecessarily raised the issue of psychological problems and the link between suicide and fame.
Many people in and outside India did not support Kumar and his associates and it is fine, as this is the beauty of democracy. Writers should try not to take sides and remain objective while writing articles or analyses.
Khalid Saifullah
No comments:
Post a Comment