The diplomatic confrontation between India and Nepal
over its new Constitution has turned into a blame-game over the pile-up
of trucks carrying goods into Nepal at three critical checkpoints along
the border.
According to a local customs
association, about 1,500 trucks laden with fuel, civil supplies and
essential foods have been held up since Wednesday on the Indian side, as
Madhesi groups protesting against what they call an unjust Constitution
have refused to let truck traffic move at all the major checkpoints,
including Birgunj, Biratnagar and Nepalgunj.
The government denies there was any move to delay goods flowing into Nepal.
“India has conveyed in no uncertain terms that there is no blockade from the Indian side,” a senior official told The Hindu.
“But we are unable to control what is happening on the Nepali side of
the border, and the prevailing situation is leading to obstructions in
trucks going through.”
On Friday, the Nepal
government had called in Ambassador Ranjit Rae to ask him to explain the
“obstructions” in supplies from India. The meeting was the second
between the Indian Ambassador and senior Nepalese officials since India
registered a strong protest over the adoption of a Constitution which it
feels disregards the Terai region.
India retorted
with another statement on Friday, telling Nepal to look at root causes
of the protests, calling the issues “political in nature.” Nepal’s PM
Sushil Koirala, who rejected India’s plea to postpone the Constitution,
has tried to reach out some of the Madhesi leadership in the past few
days. On Saturday, he travelled to Tikapur, where the first flare-up
over the Constitution occurred in August, to discuss measures to calm
the violence.
On Saturday, reports came in from
Kathmandu and other major towns across the country of people lining up
to fill up on fuel and stock up supplies, as fears spread of an economic
blockade like the one imposed by India for 13 months in 1989 as
relations between then PM Rajiv Gandhi and then King Birendra had led to
the lapse of a transit trade agreement between them. “While the fears
may be similar, there is a vast difference between 1989 and 2015,” noted
Nepal-expert and Professor at the Jawaharlal Nehru University.
“In 1989 it was a bilateral
problem that had caused the crisis. This time, the problem involves
India, and people inside Nepal, so it is much more complicated.”
No comments:
Post a Comment